Archive

Archive for January, 2009

The Third Caveat: Everything Works

January 26th, 2009

This leads to yet another caveat: “Everything works.” Since there is a reaction for every action that is not necessarily an equal and opposite reaction, not everything works for everybody. Nor does every action produce the same reaction. Everything works most effectively when it is applied to a specific set of circumstances for which it is most indicated. For instance, antibiotics work well in general, but they may not be appropriate for symptoms of a cold. Nor will they necessarily be effective against all bacteria, or for all people with bacterial infections. All too often, I have seen individuals with cold-like symptoms, not linked to a germ-specific cause, prescribed a broad-spectrum antibiotic only to become worse. So too, I have seen patients with what appeared to be similar infections completely improve in response to something as simple as oil of oregano or a broad spectrum probiotic. The same non-specific responses are seen for virtually every pharmaceutical, exercise program, diet, and stress management technique currently available.

So, despite the fact that biochemistry conforms to a somewhat linear model of observation and function (that of cause and effect), it remains a transitional arena linking the physical with the unseen realms. This relationship demonstrates an unpredictable and seemingly random pattern of behavior. As a result, part of this realm is observable and explainable, while the other is still a mystery rooted in yet another realm-that of the unseen.

The Caveats , , , , , , , ,

The Second Caveat: For Every Action There Is a Reaction

January 19th, 2009

As I attempted to apply these same methods of analysis to the unseen realms, I encountered a small problem. They do not work the same way and are far less predictable. Even less predictable was my attempt to correlate cause and effect between or among realms. Regardless of this detail, these methods did work to the extent that they unveiled another tier of knowledge in the form of another caveat: “For every action there is a reaction.” But there was a fly in the ointment. It was not just only or always an equal and opposite reaction. How could this be possible? On closer inspection, the individual realms displayed unique characteristics that further defined an orderliness of function. Yet a frustrating randomness pervaded their function. These realms flourished as individual entities, but somehow interacted to bring about life’s experiences.

For example, the biochemical realm is transitional in nature. Certain aspects of this realm are tangible and observable, while others just seem to unexpectedly appear. Consider the more than one billion cells that comprise our physical bodies. This unimaginable number arises predictably, yet without explanation, from one single cell after only fifty replications into 250 different types of cells. Each of these cells performs several million functions per second with no obvious instruction or apparent intervention.

No less amazing is the body’s response to everything and anything. If a finger is cut, emergency response teams rush in to manage the crisis. If any form of cardiovascular activity is engaged, a symphony of synchronized activities occurs in response. The heart beats faster and pumps more blood. The lungs breathe faster and harder, blood sugar levels are elevated, conversion to carbon dioxide and water intensifies as oxygen consumption increases and energy demands escalate. Conversely, saturating the body with stimulants, antacids, carbonated beverages, lifeless foods, alcohol, medications, and numerous other poisons can directly challenge this bio-chemical environment. Similarly, depriving the body of sleep, subjecting it to stresses, or abusing it in untold ways, causes predictable reactions to occur.

The Caveats , , , , , , ,

The First Caveat: Anything Can Cause Anything

January 12th, 2009

The first and most powerful caveat to emerge dictated awareness and perspective more so than a resolve of specific issues. That caveat is simply, “Anything can cause anything.” A subsequent insight posed another question. If anything can cause anything, then how is it possible to know what is causing what? At this time, my studies were limited to trying to solve a physical problem with a physical solution. By this time, I had acknowledged a possible interaction with the other spheres of influence. But I had no real clue as to how I might evaluate them or what to do if I suspected involvement of one or the other possibilities.

For that reason, I initiated a study of the laws of cause and effect and discovered a seemingly illogical and disturbing predicament. Cause and effect are predictable in the physical realm, which includes everything that can be experienced with the five senses. This is the realm of firm boundaries containing matter, objects, and three-dimensional existence. This is the domain of the material world. This realm is made up of day-to-day experiences.

In fact, the laws of cause and effect govern the physical world. It is possible to determine how far we can travel on a tank of gas, what time the sun will rise and set, how long it will take a meal to cook, how many calories must be expended to burn a pound of fat, how much pressure is required to separate a paper towel, or how much our monthly payment must be increased to reduce a mortgage and get out of debt. Regardless, finding the anything that could cause the something I was confronted with became a fundamental premise for the working model that would allow me to directly resolve these illusive symptom complexes.

The Caveats , , , , , ,